clock menu more-arrow no yes

Filed under:

Red Bull and West Ham deny Red Bull is interested in West Ham takeover

New, 2 comments

A rumor kindled and extinguished in one busy Boxing Day.

Kirby Lee-USA TODAY Sports

As fans of Leeds UnitedRangers, and even Swindon Town can attest, a Red Bull takeover rumor is one of the more reliable ways to cause a stir in British soccer circles.

The suggestion that West Ham has caught Red Bull's attention was never the most credible RB's-coming-for-your-club story, but it was the most recent. And it may be one of the more short-lived.

The Sun splashed a characteristically punning headline on a story that implied Red Bull was not so much going to buy West Ham as steal it.

The valuation seemed a little low for a Premier League club, even one striving to avoid relegation this season. And perhaps it was the almost insulting price tag that quickly drew West Ham's ownership out to refute the story. Jack Sullivan, son of David - co-owner of the Hammers - revealed a much higher offer had already been rejected:

His father put out a statement on the club's official website:

We did have a tentative approach to buy the Club for £650m from external investors in August this year, but I want to reiterate that we, the current owners, have NO DESIRE to sell the Club unless it is to somebody like the King of Saudi Arabia who can take it to a level we cannot ourselves hope to reach.

The other half of West Ham's leadership committee, David Gold, issued his own statement on Twitter:

And Red Bull also moved quickly to stamp out the rumor. Oliver Mintzlaff, head of RB Global Soccer, told Bild there was no intention to buy West Ham.

Sleep easy, West Ham fans: seems you have dodged the RB bullet.